Sponsored Comments: The Good, The Bad

Native Advertising

 

Native advertising has been called a success because it gives publishers the ability to earn a revenue without interfering with the reader experience.

A new idea has come to fruition …

On sites like Rolling Stone, Us Weekly, and Evolve Media. This new idea takes its focus on the comment sections. It’s these three publications which have adopted the idea of “Sponsored Comments” as an ad format which allows advertisers to directly target specific vertical and readers versus a broad native advertising campaign used across an entire site.

Here is an example of one such sponsored comment:

sponsoredcomment

The New York Times used this method of advertising on other sites by promoting their stories. These appeared with a “Sponsored on Disgus” disclosure and elements to ensure people understand they are ads such as a gray background.

There is, however, a problem and that stems from the fact that you can’t completely control your community especially if you wish to remain open in the comment sections. Conversations can quickly go south which could turn its attention to the sponsored material.

“In general, the ad unit would never show next to anything like that,” explained David Fleck, general manager at Disqus. Because the ads appear above the comments sections, they literally can’t be next to anything like that. There’s a definitive break between it and the rest of the comments.”

The theory behind publications adopting this ad format is that people are increasingly sticking to the middle and bottom parts of the page since they’ve already come to expect banner ads and other advertising methods toward the top.

Those that do take the time are passionate. They are willing to take their time to leave a response and voice their opinion. However, treating the comment section like another advertising channel may irk individuals and discourage their activities.

Disqus plans to slowly build this sponsored comment opportunity over time after they’ve worked out the kinks and bugs (such as trying to eliminate negative discussion closest to the ads).

It’s hard to say how all communities will react to these changes. We are already accustomed to offers, other internal links, and banners above the comment section but having one sponsored may have cross the line for some. For others it could be a new way to engage with the brands they enjoy.

Only time will tell.

  • Well, this is entirely new thing about advertisement that I have heard off. It is a unique way to place your ads but I have dilemma about the response of the audience to this types of ads.

    None the less, thanks for sharing yet another useful piece of information through this blog post.

  • Jon Fraer

    “Eliminate negative discussion closest to ads?”…so moderators skew the discussion facts so its all sweet even skewing facts. What good is a discussion then ? Its like biased news.

  • Thanks For Share your fullz article. this Article is Very Help For Us.

Sign up to Our Weekly Updates

Learn from our team of Facebook direct response advertising experts and growth hackers.